The evidence guide provides advice on assessment and must be read in conjunction with the Performance Criteria, Required Skills and Knowledge, the Range Statement and the Assessment Guidelines for this Training Package.

Critical aspects for assessment and evidence required to demonstrate competency in this unit

Assessment must confirm the ability to:

locate and interpret appropriate guidance in relevant documents

apply administrative decision making criteria to an ROG of sufficient complexity for which QA and routine inquiry reports are available.

Consistency in performance

Competency should be demonstrated in a range of situations that could be expected in the workplace.

Context of and specific resources for assessment

Context of assessment

Competency should be assessed in the workplace or in a simulated workplace environment.

Specific resources for assessment

There are no specific resource requirements for this unit.

Method of assessment

This unit may be assessed with the following unit/s:

PUADEFCM126A Conduct a quick assessment

PUADEFCM127A Conduct a Defence administrative inquiry.

In a public safety environment assessment is usually conducted via direct observation in a training environment or in the workplace via subject matter supervision and/or mentoring, which is typically recorded in a competency workbook.

Assessment is completed using appropriately qualified assessors who select the most appropriate method of assessment.

Assessment may occur in an operational environment or in an industry-approved simulated work environment. Forms of assessment that are typically used include:

direct observation

interviewing the candidate

journals and workplace documentation

third party reports from supervisors

written or oral questions.

This describes the essential skills and knowledge and their level, required for this unit.

Required Skills

apply criteria and principles

communicate effectively in writing

communicate effectively orally

conduct interviews

interpret quick assessment and inquiry reports

interpret relevant policies

lead individuals and groups

make sound judgements

manage work effectively

undertake research

Required Knowledge

administrative sanctions

closed inquiry (not public and results given to appointing commanding officer only)

complaints and redress of grievance (ROG)

evidence

imposing authority

initiating authority

inquiry instigation

inquiry monitoring

inquiry planning

relevant Australian Defence Force (ADF) policies

QAs

recommendation implementation

reports

tracking

witnesses and potentially affected persons

The Range Statement relates to the Unit of Competency as a whole. It allows for different work environments and situations that may affect performance. Bold italicised wording in the Performance Criteria is detailed below.

Administrative decisions may include

Applying administrative sanctions as an imposing authority (from a request and submission from an initiating authority)

Approval to live beyond 30 km from position

Dealing with a complaint or ROG

Eligibility for higher duties allowance

Granting leave (such as short-term, carer, parental, maternity, compassionate, long service, leave without pay, leave with holiday pay)

Imposing a formal warning

Member with dependents (unaccompanied)

Recognising Interdependent relationships

Initial actions may include

Determining decision is not within power (jurisdiction) to make

Determining whether the initiation has occurred within policy timeframes (for example, ROG for termination notice is submitted within fourteen days of notice issue, without exception)

Making a decision on a simple issue for which sufficient information has been supplied (resolution by the CO)

Making further examination of the issue

Offering alternative dispute resolution processes

Referring the matter to ADFIS and/or service police

Referring the matter to a superior authority

Taking no further action

Initiator may include

Complaint or ROG being made

Incident occurring (for instance, an accident)

Request being made

Request for a review of a previous decision

Request for a decision as an imposing authority is received from an initiating authority

Organisational policies may include

ADF publications

Defence Instructions

Instigating a QA may include

Confirming issue is connected with the scope of the CO's command

Determining need for a QA

Selecting and briefing a QA officer

Monitoring timeliness of assessment

Considering next action upon receipt of QA brief

Initiating administrative sanctions may include

Issuing a Notice to Show Cause as the initiating authority

Gathering evidence

Gathering specialist and required reports

Gathering statement of reasons from member

Considering response in determining next action

Monitoring timeliness of process

Referring collated material to an imposing authority for a decision

Factors may include

Considering inquiry reports:

confirming Terms of Reference are satisfied and scope is not exceeded

confirming evidence supports the findings

accepting or rejecting the findings

Evidence/facts provided in performance appraisal reports, records of conversation, other official documentation

Matters raised in the member's response

Policy relied upon

Recommendations from subordinates/superiors

Specialist advice (legal, psychological, medical)

Decision making criteria include

Applying policy but not inflexibly or without proper regard to the merits and circumstances of the matter

Decision being reasonable

Decision maker having the proper authority and jurisdiction (power)

Decision maker not being biased (perceived and actual)

Disregarding irrelevant factors while taking relevant considerations into account

Making decision after a fair hearing

Making decision while not under orders or dictation

Sufficient evidence (balance of probabilities [Briginshaw v Briginshaw])

Seeking legal advice where necessary